AI systems drift. Regulation punishes it. We catch it first. Vigilens lives inside the CI/CD pipeline, where AI is actually built and changed, and keeps your compliance state current at every commit, not reconstructed at audit time.
Free trial · No credit card · All evidence stays yours · Built in Oslo
It did not fail loudly. It went quietly out of spec while everyone assumed the last check still held. Our logo is that lesson, turned around: an unblinking eye, pointed at the machine, not at you.
The industry builds guardrails to defend AI from the world. Vigilens defends the world from AI, watching what your systems actually do in production, commit after commit, so the harm regulators care about never gets a head start.
The real problem is not slow documentation. It is that the people who build AI and the people accountable for it are looking at different pictures, and only compare them at audit time.
Engineers and compliance operate in different worlds, different languages, different tools. They meet at audit time, when it is already too late.
A submission-ready compliance pack takes 6 to 18 weeks. That is not documentation overhead. It is the cost of the gap compounding since the last audit.
A system that passed six months ago may behave very differently today. It drifted. It retrained. A point-in-time check misses all of that.
When the engineer and the compliance professional see the same picture in real time, the gap closes. The back-and-forth stops. The audit shrinks from weeks to days.
Jurisdiction, role, risk tier. Every framework that applies to your system, identified in minutes.
Regulations encoded as machine-executable controls. Red, amber, green results per clause, not a score.
GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Confluence, Datadog, MLflow. Hashed, timestamped, immutable evidence.
Evidence matched to controls. No language model decides pass or fail. Traceable to the clause.
A world model trained on your compliance record. Predicting the incident before it happens. In development.
Verdicts are always computed, never generated. No language model decides pass or fail.
One console. Every system, every control, every piece of evidence, current as of the last commit.
Evidence pulled continuously from GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Confluence, Datadog, and MLflow.
Hashed, timestamped, immutable. See it on your own system →
Frameworks are views over the same evidence. Connect your tools once and every regulation and standard in scope is checked against the same living record. Priced per AI system, never per framework.
Regulation 2024/1689. Risk classification, prohibited practices, high-risk obligations, and GPAI rules. Annex III deadline: 2 Dec 2027.
Data protection obligations for AI systems processing personal data. Automated decision-making under Article 22.
AI management system standard. Organisational governance of AI development, deployment, and monitoring.
Information security management. Controls for protecting the data your AI systems process and the infrastructure they run on.
Medical device quality management. Design controls, risk management, and lifecycle governance for health technology with AI components.
Medical Device Regulation 2017/745. Technical documentation, clinical evaluation, and post-market surveillance for AI-powered medical devices.
Service organisation controls for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of AI service providers.
AI Risk Management Framework. Govern, Map, Measure, Manage. The US federal approach to trustworthy AI development.
Not sure what applies to your system? The free classifier answers it in 6 questions: classification, obligations, and a personalised summary.
Run the classifier →
An ISO 13485-certified design, development, and regulatory consultancy specialising in medical and health technology. Tested the platform on a live ISO 13485 engagement: 31 controls, real evidence, real verdicts.
Member of the Norwegian Artificial Intelligence Research Consortium through its startup programme. Norway's national network for AI research and responsible innovation.
Backed by an Innovation Norway Oppstartstilskudd grant. Building critical compliance infrastructure from Oslo.
ENGINEERING
The compliance industry treats regulation as a document problem. We treat it as a software engineering problem.
Read article →
MARKET
The checklist an enterprise buyer runs before signing, and how continuous compliance changes the conversation.
Read article →
GUIDE
A practical checklist for engineering and compliance teams shipping AI systems under regulatory pressure.
Read article →
Connect a system, classify it, and watch your compliance state compute before the first coffee is cold.
Free trial · Full features · No credit card