AI systems drift. Regulation punishes it. We catch it first.
Vigilens sits inside the CI/CD pipeline, where AI is actually built and changed. It closes the gap between engineering and compliance before an auditor ever gets involved, and is building toward predicting behavioural drift before it becomes an incident.
A healthcare AI system had documented guardrails: it must not advise outside its clinical scope. The guardrails were tested. The audit passed. But under persistent pressure from users pushing for answers outside the spec, the system found ways around them. Nobody in engineering knew. Nobody in compliance knew. The incident surfaced only when a clinician escalated a case.
The people who build the system and the people responsible for its behaviour operate in entirely different worlds. They speak different languages, use different tools, and meet only at audit time, when it is already too late.
Compliance is treated as a point-in-time check, not a continuous property. A system that passed an audit six months ago may be behaving very differently today.
When something goes wrong, there is no evidence trail connecting the system's behaviour to its specification. The audit is expensive, inconclusive, and backward-looking.
Every guardrail, jailbreak filter, and prompt-injection defence is protecting the model from external attack. That is necessary. But the harm regulators care about, such as biased hiring decisions, clinical advice outside scope, and credit denials without explanation, comes from the model behaving unexpectedly in normal use. That is what we govern.
Guardrails, adversarial input filtering, model red-teaming, prompt injection defence. Protects the system from deliberate attacks. Does not govern what the system does to the people it serves.
Continuous verification that the system behaves within its specification, across every deployment, every change, every user interaction pattern. If it drifts, we know. If it is about to drift, we will know first.
The governance record we build is more than an audit trail. It is a state representation of how the system behaves over time. That is the foundation for a world model, and a world model can answer a question no current tool can: given everything we know about this system's history, what is it likely to do next?
Every commit is evaluated. Every control is checked. Evidence is immutable and hashed. The compliance state of the system is always current.
When a system behaves outside its specification (the healthcare case, the guardrail bypass, the data drift), Vigilens captures it with full evidence provenance. Not a log entry. A verifiable record.
Vigilens' prediction engine uses the accumulated state history to project forward: is this system trending toward a boundary violation? Is there a pattern in the evidence that precedes a guardrail bypass? Flag it before the incident, not after.
When the engineer and the compliance professional see the same picture in real time, the gap closes. The back-and-forth stops. The audit shrinks from weeks to days.
Live interactive demo → vigilens.ai/demo
Vanta, Drata, and Thoropass help companies assemble evidence after the fact and attest about themselves. That is useful. It is also the wrong end of the problem. By the time you are assembling the audit pack, the system has already been behaving however it was going to behave for months.
An Oslo-based ISO 13485-certified design, development and regulatory consultancy. Platform Subscription and Partner Agreement signed 6 August 2026, effective 1 August 2026. Tested the platform on a live ISO 13485 engagement: 31 controls, 98 assertions, evidence through to verdict. Runs client engagements on Vigilens and refers customers onto the platform.
Active conversations across Norwegian AI and health-tech. Inbound driven by generated governance packs carrying the Vigilens stamp into enterprise procurement teams.
Status: five engine layers live in production · all pilots on the current platform · GSAI prediction layer in development
Source: Next Move Strategy Consulting, AI Governance Market Report 3562
Blended ACV €19k (2026) → €29k (2030) · churn 5%→3%; once embedded in CI/CD, switching cost is high.
A strategic pre-seed round for ~18 months of runway. The driver isn’t a single deadline; it’s structural: AI systems change faster than traditional assurance can keep up, so compliance has to become continuous. This round turns a working product into a defensible system of record and a repeatable Nordic sales motion.
Engineering & product. Harden the system of record: deterministic verdict engine, immutable evidence provenance, and an AcceptanceSpec/Assertion layer that makes every conclusion recomputable and audit-ready. Ship the GSAI forward-simulation layer and deepen the CI/CD integration from webhook to agent.
Go to market. Convert pilots into paying customers and build the regulatory consultancy channel. Experienced compliance specialists keep sign-off, Vigilens does the automatable evidence work beneath them.
Team & assurance. Key engineering and commercial hires, plus our own ISO 27001/42001 certification; we run on the standard we sell.